Gradient Echo and Susceptibility
- Which of the following is not an advantage of gradient echo imaging over spin-echo imaging?
- Shorter TEs
- Shorter TRs
- Reduced flow artifacts
- Reduced susceptibility artifacts
Phase shifts resulting from magnetic field inhomogeneities, static tissue susceptibility gradients, or chemical shifts are not cancelled at the center of the GRE as they are in SE sequences. Image contrast is therefore dictated not by true T2-relaxation, but by these other factors which constitute T2*. GRE sequences are therefore more frequently troubled by susceptibility and chemical shift artifacts and do not function well on scanners whose magnetic fields lack homogeneity Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning multi-echo GRE, which statement is true?
- The peak value of successive echoes is determined by the T2 decay of the tissue imaged.
- The peak value of successive echoes echo is determined by the T1 value of the tissue imaged.
- One common application is for fat-water imaging.
- Each successive echo must be preceded by its own RF-pulse.
The peak value of successive echoes is determined by the T2* decay (not T2 decay) of the tissue imaged (options a and b are false). One common application of multi-echo GRE is for acquiring fat-water "in-phase" and "out-of-phase" images using two different TE's (options c is true). Only one RF pulse is used for the entire chain of echoes (option d is false). Link to Q&A discussion
- Which is not a technique for gradient echo spoiling?
- Use of very short TR
- Use of 2D multislice mode
- Use of a variable spoiler gradient
- Semirandom phase change of the RF-carrier wave
All are valid spoiling methods except choice (a). Long TR values produce “natural” spoiling, not short TRs. When TR>>T2*, the transverse magnetization will naturally decay to zero by the end of the cycle. Thus any gradient echo sequence using TR values of several hundred milliseconds will no longer have appreciable transverse coherences and be “spoiled”. Link to Q&A discussion
- A spoiled GRE sequence with TR = 10, TE = 3, and α = 50º would be considered primarily
- T1-weighted
- T2-weighted
- T2*-weighted
- Proton-density-weighted
Short TR and large α accentuate T1-weighted imaging. Link to Q&A discussion
- A spoiled GRE sequence with TR = 1000, TE = 30, and α = 5º would be considered primarily
- T1-weighted
- T2-weighted
- T2*-weighted
- Proton-density-weighted
Long TR and small α minimize T1 weighting, while long TE accentuates T2* weighting. spoiled-gre-parameters.html Link to Q&A discussion
- A spoiled GRE sequence with TR = 1000, TE = 2, and α = 5º would be considered primarily
- T1-weighted
- T2-weighted
- T2*-weighted
- Proton-density-weighted
Long TR and small α minimize T1 weighting, while short TE minimizes T2* weighting. This leaves the image more proton-density weighted than the other examples. Link to Q&A discussion
- In a spoiled GRE sequence, a low flip angle (α)
- Minimizes T1 weighting
- Accentuates T1 weighting
- Minimizes T2* weighting
- Minimizes proton density weighting
Flip angle (α) controls T1-weighting. A small flip angle minimizes T1-weighting because the longitudinal magnetizations of various tissues are not differentiated much by such a small angular displacement. Hence at small flip angles, [H] and T2* effects predominate. Conversely, as α → 90º, T1-weighting increases. Link to Q&A discussion
- In a spoiled GRE sequence, a long TE
- Maximizes T2 weighting
- Maximizes T2* weighting
- Minimizes T2 weighting
- Minimizes T2* weighting
T2*-weighting increases as TE is prolonged. This is because a longer TE allows more time for dephasing before echo formation. Link to Q&A discussion
- Which of the following SSFP pulse sequences is considered “balanced”?
- TrueFISP/FIESTA
- FISP/GRASS/FFE
- DESS/MENSA
- PSIF/T2-FFE
Sequences such as TrueFISP (Siemens) and FIESTA (GE) sample both FID-like and Echo-like SSFP signals and are considered “balanced”. Link to Q&A discussion
- Which of the following is not a condition for a SSFP signal to exist?
- TR must be longer than T2.
- Phase shifts caused by gradients must be constant from cycle to cycle.
- Field inhomogeneities must be static.
- Spins must be stationary or motion-compensated.
Choice (a) is incorrect. TR must be significantly shorter (not longer) than T2, or else natural decay processes will destroy the transverse coherence. Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning “coherent” gradient echo sequences like GRASS/FISP, which statement is false?
- If TR is long compared to T2*, the contrast resembles that of a spoiled GRE sequence.
- TE controls T2* weighting.
- Small flip angles (α) produce T1-weighted images.
- Large flip angles produce images that are weighted by T2/T1.
Choice (c) is incorrect. A small flip angle minimizes T1-weighting because the longitudinal magnetizations of various tissues are not differentiated much by such a small angular displacement. Hence at small flip angles, [H] and T2* effects predominate. Link to Q&A discussion
- An important tissue weighting present in balanced SSFP sequences like True FISP and FIESTA is
- T1
- T2*
- T1 + T2
- T2/T1
True FISP sequences behave more like spin echo than gradient echo sequences in that they do not have T2*-dependence. Also, since TR is nearly always much, much shorter than T1 or T2, the signal intensity is related to the ratio T2/T1. Link to Q&A discussion
- Excluding fluids (like urine, blood, and CSF), which of the following tissues is the brightest on balanced SSFP sequences like True FISP and FIESTA?
- Fat
- Myocardium
- Liver
- Brain
Fat is the second brightest tissue on balanced SSFP images after pure fluids. Link to Q&A discussion
- What is the explanation for the brightness of fluid and the tissue identified in the prior question?
- The T2 values are long.
- The T2* values are long.
- The T2/T1 ratios are large.
- The T1+T2 values are large.
Balanced SSFP sequences have the special property that their contrast is dependent not on just T1 or T2, but the ratio T2/T1. For most solid tissues, T1>>T2 so the T2/T1 ratio is small (< 0.10). The exceptions are fat (T2/T1 ≈ 0.30, due to its short T1) and fluids (T2/T1 ≈ 0.70, due to the fact that T1 and T2 are approximately equal). Link to Q&A discussion
- TEXTFORquestion15
- There is no substantial difference; just name changes for marketing purposes.
- More phase banding artifacts are present in CISS and FIESTA-C.
- CISS/FIESTA-C images are T1-weighted
- CISS/FIESTA-C consist of two balanced SSFP sequences run back-to-back.
FIESTA-C/CISS is composed of a pair of TrueFISP acquisitions run back-to-back preceded by an automatic shimming procedure. The first uses phase alternation of the RF-pulses (+α, −α, +α, −α, ...) while the second does not (+α, +α, +α, etc). When the paired data sets are combined in maximum intensity projection, the phase errors cancel, resulting in an image largely free of dispersion banding. Link to Q&A discussion
- Which of the following statements about DESS (dual-echo steady state) is false?
- Its main use is in musculoskeletal imaging.
- It is insensitive to motion.
- FID-like and Echo-like signal components are recorded separately during a single TR interval.
- Fluids are very bright while trabecular bone is very dark.
By means of a prolonged and unbalanced readout gradient, DESS generates the FID-like and Echo-like signals from the steady-state free precession individually. It then combines the signals on a pixel-by-pixel basis. DESS is very sensitive to motion, so option (b) is false. Its main use is in musculoskeletal imaging where joint fluid is bright and bone is dark. Link to Q&A discussion
- Which of the following statements about the GRASE (Gradient and Spin Echo) pulse sequence is true?
- It is a widely used sequence for routine head imaging.
- Its tissue energy deposition (specific absorption rate) is higher than with conventional spin echo sequences.
- It is superior to conventional spin echo (CSE) or fast spin echo (FSE) for detecting calcifications and hemorrhages.
- It is primarily used to generate T1-weighted images.
GRASE is a hybrid technique supposedly combines the best features of CSE and GRE imaging. The GRE contribution makes it useful for detecting calcification of blood (although less so than a pure GRE sequence). Its SAR is lower than a comparable fast spin-echo sequence because there are fewer RF-pulses. GRASE has never achieved much popularity as an imaging method. Link to Q&A discussion
- The SI unit for magnetic susceptibility (χ)
- Tesla
- Oersted
- Ampere-meter
- Dimensionless
Magnetic susceptibility, denoted by the Greek letter chi (χ), is defined as the magnitude of the internal polarization (J) divided by the strength of the external field (B). Since it is the ratio of two magnetic fields, susceptibility is a dimensionless number. Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning diamagnetism, which statement is false?
- The internal magnetization/polarization of a diamagnetic substance opposes the applied field.
- Diamagnetic substances have positive susceptibilities (χ > 0).
- Water, and hence most tissues, are diamagnetic.
- Calcifications are diamagnetic.
Diamagnetic substances become polarized in a manner that opposes the applied magnetic field. They have negative, not positive, susceptibilities (option b is false). Water, calcifications, and most tissues are diamagnetic. Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning paramagnetism, which statement is false?
- The internal magnetization/polarization of a paramagnetic substance is in the same direction as the applied field.
- Air is paramagnetic.
- Gadolinium contrast material is paramagnetic.
- Most steels are paramagnetic.
Paramagnetic substances become polarized in a manner that augments the applied magnetic field. They have positive susceptibilities. Surprisingly, molecular oxygen is mildly paramagnetic, so air is as well. Gadolinium contrast is paramagnetic. Most steels are ferromagnetic, a phenomenon resembling, but many orders of magnitude greater than paramagnetism. Link to Q&A discussion
- Which of the following 2D gradient echo sequences would be most useful for demonstrating small calcifications or hemorrhages in the brain?
- TR = 800, TE = 30, α = 20°
- TR = 2000, TE = 10, α = 70°
- TR = 60, TE = 3, α = 45°
- TR = 800, TE = 10, α = 45°
Hemorrhage/calcification GRE sequences are characteristically operated in 2D multi-slice mode using relatively long TR's and low flip angles (both minimizing T1 effects) and relatively long TE's (to accentuate T2* dependence). So choice (a) is the best answer. Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), which of the following is false?
- SWI images are typically acquired in 3D rather than 2D mode.
- Magnitude and phase information can be individually viewed or combined.
- SWI imaging is inferior to 3D GRE studies for detecting microhemorrhages and calcifications.
- SWI studies typically include minimum intensity images.
Multiple studies have shown that SWI imaging is superior to 3D GRE studies for detecting microhemorrhages and calcifications. Link to Q&A discussion
- Concerning SWI phase map images, which statement is incorrect?
- A lesion that is bright on a GE scanner will appear dark on a Siemens scanner.
- Phase map images are displayed using a minimum intensity projection algorithm.
- If a venous sinus appears dark on a phase image, paramagnetic blood products will also be dark.
- The choroid plexus and pineal gland provide a good internal reference for diamagnetic substances.
Phase map images are rendered in a simple magnitude mode on a slice-by-slice basis, so option (b) is false. The "colors" (black or white) of diamagnetic and paramagnetic substances on SWI phase images are scanner- dependent, so reference to a known tissue (veins for paramagnetic, choroid plexus calcification for diamagnetic) are needed as an internal check. Link to Q&A discussion